I mean, let us be blunt. How is that adolescent son or daughter supposed to realize that mom and dad who’ve never done anything insane before, and may even go to church every Sunday, are now jumping in a hot tub with a bunch of naked people and it is not assumed to be an orgy? Without any supporting context or common experience, the child’s hormones and sense of propriety inherited from his pre-naturist parents, simply protest the view. We think we are describing matters one way in our mind, like the macho soldier. But the language simply isn’t there, especially when it has a history of quite distinct meaning.

To some non-naturist buddy or family member, naked = sex. Interval.
The nudie has little or no exact language to communicate her new encounter, and the non-nudie has no experience base from which to interpret the vague language. Metaphorically speaking we may believe we are saying schwIl but we are really saying schwul when we insist to the textile, that naturism is non-sexual nudity. Then we wonder why the non-nudist frowns, fanatics, furrows his brow, or bursts out in laughter. It is really not even the correct location to start the dialog.
OK fellow nudies, can not we just admit it? We now have a cross- teen naturist videos of major proportions. Our language, when it comes to sexology, is rather poor.
They’ve 13 words for snow in a highly developed tradition of snow. They share common snow language and common snow experience. Sex is a little more complicated than snow, so we can do better than to insist that being nude is somehow utterly void of sexuality. In the end, in naturism, our genitalia, our sex if you will, is in plain sight.
If you take offense at someone seeing your penis or vulva, then obviously you would not be a nudist. On the other hand, most cloths would consider exposure of their naked body to anyone besides their spouse, either underhanded seduction, or some sort of sexual abuse. So, isn’t http://wwwthoun.com/most-popular/ of strange that we insist so strongly that our societal nudity is non-sexual? All things considered, it is not the neutral parts of our bodies, like our elbows, fingers, or toes that elicit such strong emotions. NO! It really is explicitly our exposed sexuality that brings out such reactions.
I think if we hope to win the conflicts of today to grow naturism it is important to be honest with ourselves, and to understand where many of the textiles we’re attempting to reach may be coming from. And it will not do to insist that schwul isn’t schwIl non-naturists do not get the difference!
In view of the above, sex-positive is a fantastic beginning at developing a whole new, fuller, richer vocabulary encircling naturism and sexuality. Let us stop pretending naturism has nothing related to sexuality in the non-nudist head it does, and we need to start there. Additionally, for us naturists, sex-positive is a means to begin being more confident about our own sexuality and so more actual with the textile world.
This in turn challenges us into a more profound understanding of our nude encounters and our sexuality, and how we may link them metaphorically to similar cloth experiences in ways which makes the non-naturist desire to contemplate naturism as a genuine option. Maybe we should consider this just because many fabrics are looking for a means to bring equilibrium, significance, and fulfillment for their sexuality.
What are we are afraid of, that keeps us from confronting sexuality in naturism? Does the cloth world see something that we don’t want to see?
All this is why we need at least some change in our understanding, our expertise, and our development of new language as we face shifting sexuality within cloth culture and naturism. Sex-favorable. It’s step one in coping with these changes, and hopefully in reaching many new people, to ensure they too may experience the freedom and joy that we have experienced.
In this blog we’ve considered a substantial problem in reaching the cloth world is that there’s a cross-cultural communication difference between our world and theirs. There is too little common language and expertise to bridge this difference or deal with shifting sexuality.